PhaseoPhaseo
ModelsChatCompareAppsRankings

Help keep public data accurate

See something missing, incorrect, or out of date? Tell us about this page.

PhaseoPhaseo
Checking statusChecking statusVisit status page
Component-level status is unavailable.

Explore

  • Models
  • Chat
  • Providers
  • Apps
  • Rankings
  • Tools

Resources

  • Compare
  • Migration Guides
  • Methodology
  • Blog

Community

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • X

Build

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Quickstart
  • SDKs

Company

  • About
  • Trust Centre
  • Mission
  • Pricing
  • Works With
  • Acknowledgements
  • Support
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Explore

  • Models
  • Chat
  • Providers
  • Apps
  • Rankings
  • Tools

Build

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Quickstart
  • SDKs

Resources

  • Compare
  • Migration Guides
  • Methodology
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Trust Centre
  • Mission
  • Pricing
  • Works With
  • Acknowledgements
  • Support
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Community

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • X

© 2025 • Phaseo

Change language: English (UK)
  • English (UK)
  • 简体中文
  • हिन्दी
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 日本語
  • العربية

Help:Issue·Support

Need help with Phaseo?Open an issueorcontact support

CXR14 3-Condition Macro F1

CXR14 3-Condition Macro F1

AI benchmark results and model performance

Type: numerical
View benchmark source

Recorded results

1

Average score

48.40

Score range

48.40 - 48.40

Leading model

48.40 - MedGemma 1.5 4B
Scores over time

Individual benchmark scores plotted by date.

Model results

OrganisationModelsReportedTop scoreInfoSelf reportedSource
Google
Google
MedGemma 1.5 4B13 Jan 202648.40MedGemma model card benchmark tableYesSource
Report an issue
Sign Up