PhaseoPhaseo
ModelsChatCompareAppsRankings

Help keep public data accurate

See something missing, incorrect, or out of date? Tell us about this page.

PhaseoPhaseo
Checking statusChecking statusVisit status page
Component-level status is unavailable.

Explore

  • Models
  • Chat
  • Providers
  • Apps
  • Rankings
  • Tools

Resources

  • Compare
  • Migration Guides
  • Methodology
  • Blog

Community

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • X

Build

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Quickstart
  • SDKs

Company

  • About
  • Trust Centre
  • Mission
  • Pricing
  • Works With
  • Acknowledgements
  • Support
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Explore

  • Models
  • Chat
  • Providers
  • Apps
  • Rankings
  • Tools

Build

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Quickstart
  • SDKs

Resources

  • Compare
  • Migration Guides
  • Methodology
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Trust Centre
  • Mission
  • Pricing
  • Works With
  • Acknowledgements
  • Support
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Community

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • X

© 2025 • Phaseo

Change language: English (UK)
  • English (UK)
  • 简体中文
  • हिन्दी
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 日本語
  • العربية

Help:Issue·Support

Need help with Phaseo?Open an issueorcontact support

CyBench

CyBench

AI benchmark results and model performance

Type: numericalAgents

Recorded results

1

Average score

0.39

Score range

0.39 - 0.39

Leading model

0.39 - Grok 4.1 Thinking
Scores over time

Individual benchmark scores plotted by date.

Model results

OrganisationModelsReportedTop scoreInfoSelf reportedSource
SpaceXAISpaceXAI
SpaceXAI
Grok 4.1 Thinking17 Nov 20250.39inferred modality/version alias from grok-4.1-thinking-2025-11-17YesSource
Report an issue
Sign Up