PhaseoPhaseo
ModelsChatCompareAppsRankings

Help keep public data accurate

See something missing, incorrect, or out of date? Tell us about this page.

PhaseoPhaseo
Checking statusChecking statusVisit status page
Component-level status is unavailable.

Explore

  • Models
  • Chat
  • Providers
  • Apps
  • Rankings
  • Tools

Resources

  • Compare
  • Migration Guides
  • Methodology
  • Blog

Community

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • X

Build

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Quickstart
  • SDKs

Company

  • About
  • Trust Centre
  • Mission
  • Pricing
  • Works With
  • Acknowledgements
  • Support
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Explore

  • Models
  • Chat
  • Providers
  • Apps
  • Rankings
  • Tools

Build

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Quickstart
  • SDKs

Resources

  • Compare
  • Migration Guides
  • Methodology
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Trust Centre
  • Mission
  • Pricing
  • Works With
  • Acknowledgements
  • Support
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Community

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • X

© 2025 • Phaseo

Change language: English (UK)
  • English (UK)
  • 简体中文
  • हिन्दी
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 日本語
  • العربية

Help:Issue·Support

Need help with Phaseo?Open an issueorcontact support

EyePACS Accuracy

EyePACS Accuracy

AI benchmark results and model performance

Type: numerical
View benchmark source

Recorded results

1

Average score

76.80

Score range

76.80 - 76.80

Leading model

76.80 - MedGemma 1.5 4B
Scores over time

Individual benchmark scores plotted by date.

Model results

OrganisationModelsReportedTop scoreInfoSelf reportedSource
Google
Google
MedGemma 1.5 4B13 Jan 202676.80MedGemma model card benchmark tableYesSource
Report an issue
Sign Up