PhaseoPhaseo
ModelsChatCompareAppsRankings

Help keep public data accurate

See something missing, incorrect, or out of date? Tell us about this page.

PhaseoPhaseo
Checking statusChecking statusVisit status page
Component-level status is unavailable.

Explore

  • Models
  • Chat
  • Providers
  • Apps
  • Rankings
  • Tools

Resources

  • Compare
  • Migration Guides
  • Methodology
  • Blog

Community

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • X

Build

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Quickstart
  • SDKs

Company

  • About
  • Trust Centre
  • Mission
  • Pricing
  • Works With
  • Acknowledgements
  • Support
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Explore

  • Models
  • Chat
  • Providers
  • Apps
  • Rankings
  • Tools

Build

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Quickstart
  • SDKs

Resources

  • Compare
  • Migration Guides
  • Methodology
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Trust Centre
  • Mission
  • Pricing
  • Works With
  • Acknowledgements
  • Support
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Community

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • X

© 2025 • Phaseo

Change language: English (UK)
  • English (UK)
  • 简体中文
  • हिन्दी
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 日本語
  • العربية

Help:Issue·Support

Need help with Phaseo?Open an issueorcontact support

SWE Bench Pro

SWE Bench Pro

AI benchmark results and model performance

Type: percentage

Recorded results

40

Average score

58.65%

Score range

46% - 80.30%

Leading model

80.30% - Claude Fable 5
Scores over time

Individual benchmark scores plotted by date.

Model results

OrganisationModelsReportedTop scoreInfoSelf reportedSource
AnthropicAnthropic
Anthropic
Claude Fable 509 Jun 202680.30%Higher of Mythos 5 / Fable 5 in Anthropic's launch tableYesSource
AnthropicAnthropic
Anthropic
Claude Mythos 509 Jun 202680.30%Higher of Mythos 5 / Fable 5 in Anthropic's launch tableYesSource
AnthropicAnthropic
Anthropic
Claude Opus 524 Jul 202679.20%Adaptive thinking at max effort; default sampling settings; average of 5 trialsYesSource
AnthropicAnthropic
Anthropic
Claude Mythos Preview07 Apr 202677.80%-YesSource
Sakana AI
Sakana AI
Fugu Ultra22 Jun 202673.70%Sakana Fugu product page benchmark table.YesSource
AnthropicAnthropic
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.828 May 202669.20%Max effort; avg 5 trialsYesSource
AnthropicAnthropic
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.716 Apr 202664.30%-YesSource
AnthropicAnthropic
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 530 Jun 202663.20%SWE-bench Pro; standard configuration; average over five trialsYesSource
Qwen
Qwen
Qwen 3.8 27B14 Aug 202661.70%-YesSource
Meta
Meta
Muse Spark 1.109 Jul 202661.50%Diverse software engineeringYesSource
Qwen
Qwen
Qwen 3.7 Max21 May 202660.60%SWE-Pro; refined benchmark; internal agent scaffoldYesSource
PoolsidePoolside
Poolside
Laguna S 2.121 Jul 202659.40%public dataset mean pass@1YesSource
MiniMax
MiniMax
MiniMax M301 Jun 202659%-YesSource
Sakana AI
Sakana AI
Fugu22 Jun 202659%Sakana Fugu product page benchmark table.YesSource
OpenAIOpenAI
OpenAI
GPT 5.523 Apr 202658.60%PublicYesSource
z.AIz.AI
z.AI
GLM 5.107 Apr 202658.40%-YesSource
OpenAIOpenAI
OpenAI
GPT 5 Pro07 Aug 202557.70%inferred family alias from gpt-5.4 (score=0.4083; benches=19)YesSource
OpenAIOpenAI
OpenAI
GPT 5 Search API14 Oct 202557.70%inferred family alias from gpt-5.4 (score=0.3050; benches=19)YesSource
OpenAIOpenAI
OpenAI
GPT 5.405 Mar 202657.70%PublicYesSource
OpenAIOpenAI
OpenAI
GPT 5.3 Codex05 Feb 202656.80%Public; xhigh reasoningYesSource
Qwen
Qwen
Qwen 3.6 Plus01 Apr 202656.60%-YesSource
OpenAIOpenAI
OpenAI
GPT 5.2 Codex18 Dec 202556.40%-YesSource
MiniMax
MiniMax
MiniMax M2.718 Mar 202656.20%-YesSource
Xiaomi
Xiaomi
MiMo V2.523 Apr 202656.10%Hugging Face evaluation resultYesSource
OpenAIOpenAI
OpenAI
GPT 5.211 Dec 202555.60%-YesSource
Report an issue
Sign Up