Kimi K3 vs Qwen 3.8 27B

Pick a route and service tier under each model. Prices, the calculator and the verdicts follow your choice.

Kimi K3
Qwen 3.8 27B

At a glance

Generated from the rows below

Choose Kimi K3 for

  • The highest Epoch Capabilities Index (158.3)
  • The largest context window: 1,048,576 tokens
  • The longest output: 1,048,576 tokens

Choose Qwen 3.8 27B for

  • The lowest cost per typical request ($0.0006)

Overview

Context window
1.05Mtokens (best)
262Ktokens
Max output
1.05Mtokens (best)
131Ktokensfrom provider listings
Takes
Text, Images, Video
Text, Images, Video
Returns
Text
Text
Routes on Phaseo
21 providers (best)
13 providers
Released
16 Jul 2026
14 Aug 2026

Pricing

Prices on the route and tier chosen under each model

Wafer · StandardEmpirioLabs AI · Standard
Input
$1.44/ 1M tokens
$0.17/ 1M tokens (best)
Output
$9.00/ 1M tokens
$0.50/ 1M tokens (best)
Cache read
$0.30/ 1M tokens
$0.08/ 1M tokens (best)
Typical request2K tokens in, 500 out
$0.0074
$0.0006 (best)

What will it cost?

Estimate a month of requests on the route and tier chosen for each model

ModelPer requestPer month
Kimi K3Wafer · Standard$0.0074$221.40
Qwen 3.8 27BEmpirioLabs AI · Standard$0.0006$17.70

Uses the route and tier chosen under each model, over 30 days. Cached input is billed at the cache-read rate.

Performance

Live gateway traffic

Latency p50
No traffic yet
No traffic yet
Throughput p50
No traffic yet
No traffic yet
Requests, last 24 hours
No traffic yet
No traffic yet

Activity

Tokens sent through Phaseo each day over the last 30 days

None of these models has had traffic through Phaseo in the last 30 days.

Features

Features from the parameters Phaseo routes support

Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured outputs
Yes
Yes
Reasoning effort
Yes
Yes
Web search
Yes
Yes
Prompt cachingon the chosen route
Yes
Yes
Quantisationon the chosen route
Not stated
Not stated

Benchmarks

Only results that two or more of the selected models report get a row

Compare at effort

Epoch Capabilities Index Independent

Higher is better · dot is the estimate, band is the 95% confidence interval · Epoch AI, CC BY 4.0

Kimi K3158.3 95% CI 155.8–161.3
Qwen 3.8 27B151.8 95% CI 149.8–153.6

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Independent

Higher is better · at Low effort · 2 of 2 models tested

Kimi K330.1
Qwen 3.8 27B26.2

Where they rank

The five leaders on each capability index, then the compared models. Each model at its best-scoring setting.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index42 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Opus 5.558.4
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra56.9
  3. #3GPT-6.1 Sol54.5
  4. #4Claude Sonnet 5.554.2
  5. #5GPT-6.1 Terra51.0
  6. #29Qwen 3.8 27B20.1
  7. #32Kimi K317.4

Artificial Analysis Coding Index171 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Fable 5.181.6
  2. #2GPT 5.6 Sol78.3
  3. #3Claude Opus 578.0
  4. #4GPT-6 Astra77.1
  5. #5Grok 4.676.8
  6. #10Kimi K376.2
  7. #33Qwen 3.8 27B68.1

Artificial Analysis Agentic Index112 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Fable 5.157.9
  2. #2Claude Opus 556.5
  3. #3Qwen 3.8 Max 090256.0
  4. #4Muse Spark 1.355.5
  5. #5Qwen 3.8 Flash Next53.6
  6. #13Kimi K350.0
  7. #16Qwen 3.8 27B45.8

Epoch Capabilities Index164 models ranked

  1. #1GPT-6 Astra169.1
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.5168.4
  3. #3GPT-6.1 Terra168.1
  4. #4GPT-6.1 Sol167.8
  5. #5Claude Sonnet 5.5166.7
  6. #19Kimi K3158.3
  7. #53Qwen 3.8 27B151.8
Agentic
Artificial Analysis Agentic Indexmatched by effort level
29.3
38.9 (best)
Coding
Artificial Analysis Coding Indexmatched by effort level
72 (best)
58.2
Cost
Artificial Analysis Evaluation Cost (USD)matched by effort level · lower is better
$1,190
$1,165 (best)
Artificial Analysis Evaluation Cost (USD)matched by effort level · lower is better
$1,764
$1,460 (best)
General
17.4 (best)
15.7
299.0 (best)
283.0
Code
DeepSWEreported by the lab
67.5% (best)KimiCode harness
42.2%DeepSWE 1.1
Terminal Bench 2.1reported by the lab
88.3% (best)KimiCode harness
73%Terminus harness
General-knowledge
GPQA Diamondreported by the lab
93.5% (best)
89.2%
Agents
JobBenchreported by the lab
52.9% (best)
33.4%
Math
MathVisionreported by the lab
94.3%Average of three runs.
94.6% (best)With CI
Other
CharXiv-RQreported by the lab
84.8RQ variant
90.2 (best)With CI
Humanity's Last Examreported by the lab
43.5% (best)HLE-Full without tools.
30.8%HLE

Lab-reported results come from each lab’s own launch materials and may use different settings. Independent results come from third-party evaluators.

Providers

Routes Phaseo serves today, standard-tier prices per 1M tokens

  • Wafer
    Wafer
    Input
    $1.44
    Output
    $9.00
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard

  • Wafer (ZDR)
    Input
    $1.44
    Output
    $9.00
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard

  • SiliconFlow
    SiliconFlow
    Input
    $2.70
    Output
    $13.50
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard

  • Morph
    Morph
    Input
    $2.50
    Output
    $14.00
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard

  • DeepInfra
    DeepInfra
    Input
    $2.85
    Output
    $14.25
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard

  • Moonshot AI
    Moonshot AI
    Input
    $3.00
    Output
    $15.00
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard

  • Arcee AI
    Arcee AI
    Input
    $3.00
    Output
    $15.00
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard

  • AtlasCloud
    AtlasCloud
    Input
    $3.00
    Output
    $15.00
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard

  • Baseten
    Baseten
    Input
    $3.00
    Output
    $15.00
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard

  • Canopy Wave
    Canopy Wave
    Input
    $3.00
    Output
    $15.00
    Context window
    1,000,000

    Standard

  • Doubleword
    Doubleword
    Input
    $3.00
    Output
    $15.00
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard, Batch, Flex

  • EmpirioLabs AI
    EmpirioLabs AI
    Input
    $3.00
    Output
    $15.00
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard

  • Fireworks
    Fireworks
    Input
    $3.00
    Output
    $15.00
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard, Priority

  • GMICloud
    GMICloud
    Input
    $3.00
    Output
    $15.00
    Context window
    262,144

    Standard

  • Inference.net
    Inference.net
    Input
    $3.00
    Output
    $15.00
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard

  • Nebius Token Factory
    Nebius Token Factory
    Input
    $3.00
    Output
    $15.00
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard

  • NovitaAI
    NovitaAI
    Input
    $3.00
    Output
    $15.00
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard

  • TensorX
    Input
    $3.00
    Output
    $15.00
    Context window
    1,000,000

    Standard

  • Together
    Together
    Input
    $3.00
    Output
    $15.00
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard

  • IO.net
    IO.net
    Input
    $3.06
    Output
    $15.30
    Context window
    1,048,576

    Standard

  • Venice
    Venice
    Input
    –
    Output
    –
    Context window
    1,000,000

    Priority

Standard-tier prices. The first row is the cheapest route; pick another under the model’s name at the top.

Also listed, not routed by Phaseo: 31 providers

Abacus, AkashML, Berget.AI, Chutes, Cloudflare, CoreWeave Forge, CrofAI, CrossModel, DigitalOcean, FastRouter, Hugging Face, Inference, Kilo Gateway, Modal, Moonshot AI Turbo, NanoGPT, Neuralwatt, NVIDIA, OpenRouter, OrcaRouter, Parasail, Perplexity Agent, Phala, Pioneer, Relace, Requesty, Sail Research, Tencent Cloud, Venice (E2EE), Vercel AI Gateway, ZenMux

Shown for reference: other gateways’ listings and routes Phaseo has retired or disabled.

Details

Knowledge cutoff
Not published
Not published
Status
Available
Available
Licence
Modified MIT
Apache 2.0
Subscription plans
10 plansGitHub Copilot Business, GitHub Copilot Enterprise, GitHub Copilot Max…
None mapped
API docs
Not published

Kimi K3 vs Qwen 3.8 27B: side-by-side summary

Kimi K3 and Qwen 3.8 27B are both available through the Phaseo API, so switching between them is a change of model id rather than a new integration.

Kimi K3 is from Moonshot. It has a 1,048,576-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $1.44 per 1M input tokens and $9.00 per 1M output tokens.

Qwen 3.8 27B is from Qwen. It has a 262,144-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.17 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens.

Kimi K3 model details, providers and pricingQwen 3.8 27B model details, providers and pricing

Kimi K3 vs Qwen 3.8 27B at a glance

Kimi K3 and Qwen 3.8 27B compared on price, context window and benchmark score
AttributeKimi K3Qwen 3.8 27B
LabMoonshotQwen
Input price per 1M tokens$1.44$0.17
Output price per 1M tokens$9.00$0.50
Context window1,048,576 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output1,048,576 tokens131,072 tokens
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index17.4 (#32)20.1 (#29)

Prices are each model's cheapest standard route on Phaseo. Benchmark ranks use each model's best-scoring evaluated setting.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Qwen 3.8 27B?

Qwen 3.8 27B is cheaper for both input and output tokens. Kimi K3 costs $1.44 per 1M input tokens and $9.00 per 1M output tokens; Qwen 3.8 27B costs $0.17 and $0.50, each on its cheapest standard route on Phaseo.

Which has the longer context window, Kimi K3 or Qwen 3.8 27B?

Kimi K3 has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 262,144 tokens for Qwen 3.8 27B.

Which scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Kimi K3 or Qwen 3.8 27B?

Qwen 3.8 27B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Qwen 3.8 27B scores 20.1, ranked #29 of 42. Kimi K3 scores 17.4, ranked #32 of 42.

Can I use Kimi K3 and Qwen 3.8 27B through one API?

Yes. Both are served through the Phaseo API, so you can switch between them by changing the model id.

Help keep public data accurate

See something missing, incorrect, or out of date? Tell us about this page.