Muse Glimmer 30B vs Inkling

Pick a route and service tier under each model. Prices, the calculator and the verdicts follow your choice.

Muse Glimmer 30B
Inkling

At a glance

Generated from the rows below

Choose Muse Glimmer 30B for

  • The lowest cost per typical request ($0.0004)

Choose Inkling for

  • The largest context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • The only one that takes audio
  • The longest output: 65,536 tokens

Overview

Context window
131Ktokens
1Mtokens (best)
Max output
32.8Ktokensfrom provider listings
65.5Ktokens (best)from provider listings
Takes
Text, Images
Text, Images, Audio
Returns
Text
Text
Routes on Phaseo
3 providers
3 providers
Released
10 Aug 2026
15 Jul 2026

Pricing

Prices on the route and tier chosen under each model

Doubleword · StandardFireworks · Standard
Input
$0.11/ 1M tokens (best)
$1.00/ 1M tokens
Output
$0.32/ 1M tokens (best)
$4.05/ 1M tokens
Cache read
$0.01/ 1M tokens (best)
$0.17/ 1M tokens
Typical request2K tokens in, 500 out
$0.0004 (best)
$0.004

What will it cost?

Estimate a month of requests on the route and tier chosen for each model

ModelPer requestPer month
Muse Glimmer 30BDoubleword · Standard$0.0004$11.40
InklingFireworks · Standard$0.004$120.75

Uses the route and tier chosen under each model, over 30 days. Cached input is billed at the cache-read rate.

Performance

Live gateway traffic

Latency p50
No traffic yet
No traffic yet
Throughput p50
No traffic yet
No traffic yet
Requests, last 24 hours
No traffic yet
No traffic yet

Activity

Tokens sent through Phaseo each day over the last 30 days

None of these models has had traffic through Phaseo in the last 30 days.

Features

Features from the parameters Phaseo routes support

Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured outputs
Yes
Not listed
Reasoning effort
Yes
Yes
Web search
Not listed
Yes
Prompt cachingon the chosen route
Yes
Yes
Quantisationon the chosen route
Not stated
Not stated

Benchmarks

Only results that two or more of the selected models report get a row

Compare at effort

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Independent

Higher is better · at Extra high effort · 1 of 2 models tested

Muse Glimmer 30BNot tested at this effort
Inkling25

Where they rank

The five leaders on each capability index, then the compared models. Each model at its best-scoring setting.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index42 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Opus 5.558.4
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra56.9
  3. #3GPT-6.1 Sol54.5
  4. #4Claude Sonnet 5.554.2
  5. #5GPT-6.1 Terra51.0
  6. #35Inkling12.5
  7. #38Muse Glimmer 30B6.3

Artificial Analysis Coding Index171 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Fable 5.181.6
  2. #2GPT 5.6 Sol78.3
  3. #3Claude Opus 578.0
  4. #4GPT-6 Astra77.1
  5. #5Grok 4.676.8
  6. #58Inkling52.1
  7. #66Muse Glimmer 30B49.0

Artificial Analysis Agentic Index112 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Fable 5.157.9
  2. #2Claude Opus 556.5
  3. #3Qwen 3.8 Max 090256.0
  4. #4Muse Spark 1.355.5
  5. #5Qwen 3.8 Flash Next53.6
  6. #44Inkling22.5
  7. #63Muse Glimmer 30B8.5

Epoch Capabilities Index164 models ranked

  1. #1GPT-6 Astra169.1
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.5168.4
  3. #3GPT-6.1 Terra168.1
  4. #4GPT-6.1 Sol167.8
  5. #5Claude Sonnet 5.5166.7
  6. #66Inkling148.5
Agentic
Artificial Analysis Agentic Indexmatched by effort level
Not tested at this effort
22.5
Coding
Artificial Analysis Coding Indexmatched by effort level
Not tested at this effort
52.1
Cost
Artificial Analysis Evaluation Cost (USD)matched by effort level · lower is better
Not tested at this effort
$1,015
Artificial Analysis Evaluation Cost (USD)matched by effort level · lower is better
Not tested at this effort
$1,237
General
Not tested at this effort
12.5
Not tested at this effort
281.4

Lab-reported results come from each lab’s own launch materials and may use different settings. Independent results come from third-party evaluators.

Providers

Routes Phaseo serves today, standard-tier prices per 1M tokens

  • Doubleword
    Doubleword
    Input
    $0.11
    Output
    $0.32
    Context window
    131,072

    Standard, Batch, Flex

  • EmpirioLabs AI
    EmpirioLabs AI
    Input
    $0.20
    Output
    $0.80
    Context window
    131,072

    Standard

  • Together
    Together
    Input
    $0.35
    Output
    $1.50
    Context window
    131,072

    Standard

Standard-tier prices. The first row is the cheapest route; pick another under the model’s name at the top.

Also listed, not routed by Phaseo: 9 providers

DeepInfra, Fireworks, Kilo Gateway, NanoGPT, NVIDIA, OpenRouter, Phala, Requesty, Vercel AI Gateway

Shown for reference: other gateways’ listings and routes Phaseo has retired or disabled.

Details

Knowledge cutoff
Not published
Apr 2026
Status
Available
Available
Licence
Apache 2.0
Apache 2.0
Subscription plans
None mapped
None mapped

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Inkling: side-by-side summary

Muse Glimmer 30B and Inkling are both available through the Phaseo API, so switching between them is a change of model id rather than a new integration.

Muse Glimmer 30B is from Meta. It has a 131,072-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.11 per 1M input tokens and $0.32 per 1M output tokens.

Inkling is from Thinking Machines Lab. It has a 1,000,000-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $1.00 per 1M input tokens and $4.05 per 1M output tokens.

Muse Glimmer 30B model details, providers and pricingInkling model details, providers and pricing

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Inkling at a glance

Muse Glimmer 30B and Inkling compared on price, context window and benchmark score
AttributeMuse Glimmer 30BInkling
LabMetaThinking Machines Lab
Input price per 1M tokens$0.11$1.00
Output price per 1M tokens$0.32$4.05
Context window131,072 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens65,536 tokens
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index6.3 (#38)12.5 (#35)

Prices are each model's cheapest standard route on Phaseo. Benchmark ranks use each model's best-scoring evaluated setting.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Inkling?

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper for both input and output tokens. Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.11 per 1M input tokens and $0.32 per 1M output tokens; Inkling costs $1.00 and $4.05, each on its cheapest standard route on Phaseo.

Which has the longer context window, Muse Glimmer 30B or Inkling?

Inkling has the longer context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 131,072 tokens for Muse Glimmer 30B.

Which scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Muse Glimmer 30B or Inkling?

Inkling scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Inkling scores 12.5, ranked #35 of 42. Muse Glimmer 30B scores 6.3, ranked #38 of 42.

Can I use Muse Glimmer 30B and Inkling through one API?

Yes. Both are served through the Phaseo API, so you can switch between them by changing the model id.

Help keep public data accurate

See something missing, incorrect, or out of date? Tell us about this page.