Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs GPT-6 Luna
Pick a route and service tier under each model. Prices, the calculator and the verdicts follow your choice.
At a glance
Generated from the rows below
Choose Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 for
- The longest output: 262,144 tokens
Choose GPT-6 Luna for
- The lowest cost per typical request ($0.0002)
- The largest context window: 1,050,000 tokens
- The only one that takes images
Overview
Pricing
Prices on the route and tier chosen under each model
What will it cost?
Estimate a month of requests on the route and tier chosen for each model
Uses the route and tier chosen under each model, over 30 days. Cached input is billed at the cache-read rate.
Performance
Live gateway traffic
Activity
Tokens sent through Phaseo each day over the last 30 days
- Input
- Output
- Reasoning
No traffic through Phaseo in the last 30 days
153Ktokens, last 30 days
- Input
- 145K
- Output
- 6.59K
- Reasoning
- 957
- Requests
- 239
Features
Features from the parameters Phaseo routes support
Benchmarks
Only results that two or more of the selected models report get a row
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Independent
Higher is better · at Max effort · 1 of 2 models tested
Where they rank
The five leaders on each capability index, then the compared models. Each model at its best-scoring setting.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index42 models ranked
- #1Claude Opus 5.558.4
- #2GPT-6 Astra56.9
- #3GPT-6.1 Sol54.5
- #4Claude Sonnet 5.554.2
- #5GPT-6.1 Terra51.0
- #19Ling 3.1 Flash 101929.5
- #22GPT-6 Luna27.8
Epoch Capabilities Index164 models ranked
- #1GPT-6 Astra169.1
- #2Claude Opus 5.5168.4
- #3GPT-6.1 Terra168.1
- #4GPT-6.1 Sol167.8
- #5Claude Sonnet 5.5166.7
- #27GPT-6 Luna156.8
Lab-reported results come from each lab’s own launch materials and may use different settings. Independent results come from third-party evaluators.
Providers
Routes Phaseo serves today, standard-tier prices per 1M tokens
Details
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs GPT-6 Luna: side-by-side summary
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 and GPT-6 Luna are both available through the Phaseo API, so switching between them is a change of model id rather than a new integration.
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is from Inclusion AI. It has a 1,000,000-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $0.90 per 1M output tokens.
GPT-6 Luna is from OpenAI. It has a 1,050,000-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.00 per 1M output tokens.
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 model details, providers and pricingGPT-6 Luna model details, providers and pricing
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs GPT-6 Luna at a glance
| Attribute | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Lab | Inclusion AI | OpenAI |
| Input price per 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.10 |
| Output price per 1M tokens | $0.90 | $0.00 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 29.5 (#19) | 27.8 (#22) |
Prices are each model's cheapest standard route on Phaseo. Benchmark ranks use each model's best-scoring evaluated setting.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 or GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna is cheaper for both input and output tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $0.90 per 1M output tokens; GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 and $0.00, each on its cheapest standard route on Phaseo.
Which has the longer context window, Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 or GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna has the longer context window at 1,050,000 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for Ling 3.1 Flash 1019.
Which scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 or GPT-6 Luna?
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores 29.5, ranked #19 of 42. GPT-6 Luna scores 27.8, ranked #22 of 42.
Can I use Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 and GPT-6 Luna through one API?
Yes. Both are served through the Phaseo API, so you can switch between them by changing the model id.