Mistral Large 4 Preview vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Pick a route and service tier under each model. Prices, the calculator and the verdicts follow your choice.
At a glance
Generated from the rows below
Choose Mistral Large 4 Preview for
No clear lead on the rows below.
Choose GLM 5.3 Flash for
- The largest context window: 1,048,576 tokens
- The only one that takes video
The models are statistically tied on the Epoch Capabilities Index: their 95% confidence intervals overlap.
Overview
Pricing
Prices on the route and tier chosen under each model
What will it cost?
Estimate a month of requests on the route and tier chosen for each model
Uses the route and tier chosen under each model, over 30 days. Cached input is billed at the cache-read rate.
Performance
Live gateway traffic
Activity
Tokens sent through Phaseo each day over the last 30 days
None of these models has had traffic through Phaseo in the last 30 days.
Features
Features from the parameters Phaseo routes support
Benchmarks
Only results that two or more of the selected models report get a row
Epoch Capabilities Index Independent
Higher is better · dot is the estimate, band is the 95% confidence interval · Epoch AI, CC BY 4.0
Every interval overlaps, so these models are statistically tied on this index.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Independent
Higher is better · each model’s best reported variant
Where they rank
The five leaders on each capability index, then the compared models. Each model at its best-scoring setting.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index42 models ranked
- #1Claude Opus 5.558.4
- #2GPT-6 Astra56.9
- #3GPT-6.1 Sol54.5
- #4Claude Sonnet 5.554.2
- #5GPT-6.1 Terra51.0
- #22GLM 5.3 Flash27.8
- #26Mistral Large 4 Preview25.3
Artificial Analysis Coding Index171 models ranked
- #1Claude Fable 5.181.6
- #2GPT 5.6 Sol78.3
- #3Claude Opus 578.0
- #4GPT-6 Astra77.1
- #5Grok 4.676.8
- #22GLM 5.3 Flash71.5
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index112 models ranked
- #1Claude Fable 5.157.9
- #2Claude Opus 556.5
- #3Qwen 3.8 Max 090256.0
- #4Muse Spark 1.355.5
- #5Qwen 3.8 Flash Next53.6
- #9GLM 5.3 Flash50.9
Epoch Capabilities Index164 models ranked
- #1GPT-6 Astra169.1
- #2Claude Opus 5.5168.4
- #3GPT-6.1 Terra168.1
- #4GPT-6.1 Sol167.8
- #5Claude Sonnet 5.5166.7
- #47GLM 5.3 Flash153.2
- #56Mistral Large 4 Preview150.6
Lab-reported results come from each lab’s own launch materials and may use different settings. Independent results come from third-party evaluators.
Providers
Routes Phaseo serves today, standard-tier prices per 1M tokens
Phaseo doesn’t route Mistral Large 4 Preview today.
Details
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs GLM 5.3 Flash: side-by-side summary
Mistral Large 4 Preview is from Mistral. It has a 524,288-token context window.
GLM 5.3 Flash is from z.AI. It has a 1,048,576-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.075 per 1M input tokens and $0.25 per 1M output tokens.
Mistral Large 4 Preview model details, providers and pricingGLM 5.3 Flash model details, providers and pricing
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs GLM 5.3 Flash at a glance
| Attribute | Mistral Large 4 Preview | GLM 5.3 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Lab | Mistral | z.AI |
| Input price per 1M tokens | Not listed | $0.075 |
| Output price per 1M tokens | Not listed | $0.25 |
| Context window | 524,288 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | Not listed | 131,072 tokens |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 25.3 (#26) | 27.8 (#22) |
Prices are each model's cheapest standard route on Phaseo. Benchmark ranks use each model's best-scoring evaluated setting.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the longer context window, Mistral Large 4 Preview or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 524,288 tokens for Mistral Large 4 Preview.
Which scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Mistral Large 4 Preview or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. GLM 5.3 Flash scores 27.8, ranked #22 of 42. Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 25.3, ranked #26 of 42.